Most of my blog readers know that I'm living in Scotland. Most of you also know that Scotland isn't an independent nation - it has been under English rule since 1707 when they dissolved the Scottish parliament and basically handed power over to London. It's been a cause of debate since then, and now, 300 years later, the question has come up again.
I knew that when I was planning on coming here that the question of independence was a hot topic. With the UK General Elections coming up (and the current Labour party not thought to return), the question of independence is becoming more and more of a hot topic. Today, one of the Scottish Parliament members (the parliament was reformed in 1998, though it has very limited powers), basically came out asking for independence. A member of the SNP (Scottish National Party), he wants to put out a referendum, giving the Scottish people a say in what they want. However, the SNP doesn't hold a majority power and the other parties have stated that they'll put the bill down.
Ok. So there's the explanation. Roughly. My question is - what are they afraid of? Ask the people what they want? There were interviews with several other MSPs tonight, and they were all so sure that the Scottish people don't want independence. They might want more power transferred to Holyrood from London, but they don't want to be an independent nation. One parliament member in particular was almost hostile about this.
But how do they know what the Scottish people want if they don't even ask the question?
I have plenty of friends who are all for independence. Some people have made the point that an actual dissolution of the Union might wait until the current economic crisis is over, but they want independence.
I know that I'm American, and this might flavor my opinion, but I firmly believe that in order to claim to be a real democracy, they need to represent this to the people. They need to get a say from those that it would most affect.
This wouldn't be the first time there was a referendum. London generously "provided" the opportunity for Scotland to vote for a chance to have their own parliament again, but the stipulations were so strict that it was impossible for it to pass. They finally succeeded in 1998. It's been 11 years, and I think that's enough time to ask the question, even if they do get a "No" for independence this time around. At least then they would know the actual answer.
Queen Elizabeth would still be the recognized monarch. There wouldn't be border controls put in place throughout the UK. Basically, the only thing that would change is that Scotland would be a recognized country in the EU and finally hold the power to run the country the way that they want to.
As a student of Scottish literature, I have spent two and a half years reading literature calling for independence. Others have praised the Union and tried to shore up a national identity for Scotland with a loss of political independence. I can tell you that this debate has been going on since 1707. It's not a new debate, and there have been stronger surges throughout the years, but I would take just the literature as a representation that the Scottish people want something else. When I was in Edinburgh in 2007, there were different graffitied signs of "Scottish Not British" and "End London Rule Now."
So, even though I'm outside of this debate, I poise the question - why not let the Scottish people decide - finally - what they really want? The fact that the majority of the Scottish Parliament don't even want to ask the question really worries me. Just as rich landowners decided to enter the Union in the 18th century, so the politicians are making a decision that should be left up to the people.
More Love
-
I've been thinking a lot about what makes us all so hard on ourselves.
Especially as a Mormon gal, I have seen so many of my friends, including
myself, go...
18 hours ago